|
Turn to the East
"Japan is different in a different way" - that, in any
case, is what the hero in Cees Nooteboom's novel Mokusei claims
in an effort to describe how difficult it is for a Western mind to
understand the complexities of Japanese culture with all its various
influences. Yet at the same time, Tokyo seems to be well on its way
towards becoming the main hub of the new art of the 21st century. In
this vein, Francesco Bonami presented the Japanese artist Takashi
Murakami at the Venice Biennale as a key figure of today's art scene.
Margrit Brehm's essay provides a sketch of contemporary Japanese art
from calligraphy to Tokyo Pop.
"The world of the future might
be like Japan is today - superflat" Takashi Murakami
Ikiro in
Otterloo, Kaikai Kiki in
Paris, Senritsumirai in
Prato, Yume no Ato in Berlin and
Baden-Baden, Japan: Keramik und Fotografie (Japan: Ceramics and
Photography) in
Hamburg, Weiche Brüche: Japan (Soft Breaks: Japan) in
Innsbruck, The Japanese Experience in
Kraichtal - a glance at the program calendars of museums and exhibition
venues across Europe (and, even earlier, in America) clearly shows that
contemporary Japanese art is in keen demand. One could, of course,
interpret the heightened attention currently being paid to the works of
the young and youngest generation of Japanese artists by international
curators as just another side of the global market in search of ever
newer sensations. A reference to the steadily growing popularity of
Mangas in the West and the successful marketing of the fantasy beings that
play the role of protagonists in this Japanese-style comic book could
also serve as an argument for why Japan seems to have grown a tiny bit
closer to Europe. Catchwords like globalization and changes in consumer
behavior alone, however, are far too general to explain why contemporary
art from Japan has met with such great interest, particularly among
artists - or just what changes in the art system's structure this might
imply.

Jiro Osuga, Coach Journey, 2001, Deutsche Bank Collection
In his exhibition
From Rauschenberg to Murakami in the Museo Correr, Francesco
Bonami, curator of this year's Venice Biennale, has indicated that this
turn to the East can indeed be evaluated as a sign of a deeper-reaching
shift in perspective. When Robert Rauschenberg was awarded the
Biennale's first prize for painting in 1964, it crowned the young
American as the "Picasso" of the second half of the century and,
according to Bonami, ultimately secured America's dominance in the field
of contemporary art. When Bonami promotes the Japanese artist
Takashi Murakami as a key figure of today's art scene, he is also, at the
same time, diagnosing a new shift in emphasis. For him, Murakami's
painting stands for the future, for an art production of the 21st
century. "Murakami's canvases of cyborg and cosmic characters resonate
with dynamic futuristic energy that reaches the unfathomable realm of
our imagination."
As yet, it's nothing more than a thesis -
but the signs are increasing that Japanese artists will be assuming
central importance in the further development of international art.
Around a hundred years ago, European art was luxuriating in
Japonisme and its attention was primarily directed towards "old Japan" -
which we today recognize, at least in part, as a projection of European
longing onto a country that was to a large degree unknown. In contrast,
the fascination inspired today by contemporary Japanese art is due to
its future potential. The works have not only awakened interest in the
West, but have also prompted discussions concerning contemporary art's
potential to reflect both upon its own position in the age of the global
information society and upon the strategies artists use to find
different locations and secure a new public presence.
At the
center of attention are works by artists born in the late fifties and
sixties that challenge, surprise, and fascinate our habits of seeing.
Clear flat surfaces of color dominate figurative paintings whose
pictorial vocabulary combines
Manga adaptations and references to the personal state in a highly
specific sampling method that employs references both to Japanese and
Western art traditions.
|
This crossover, which can be particularly found in Tokyo Pop and an art
movement called Kairaku Kaiga (painting of joy), also
characterizes Japanese photography. It is even easier, perhaps, to see
the ambivalence between tradition and innovation, East and West in the
works of this "modern" medium, an ambivalence that determines Japanese
thinking and the aesthetic it gives rise to.

Yutaka Sone: Her 19th Foot, 1997,
Deutsche Bank Collection
Thus, photographs
that often resemble snapshots and speak of an involvement with our time,
urban life in Tokyo's high-tech society, and the social environment
contrast with austerely composed works whose attention to nature or city
scenes devoid of human beings harbors formal references to the
traditional "Zen idea" of the image as sign.

Tomoko Maezawa: Grass 8, 1999
Deutsche Bank Collection
This first glance
into the production of Japanese artists today and the broad range of
styles and positions involved suffices to show that it's just as
impossible to speak of "Japanese art" as it is to speak of "German" or
"American art." If one were to nonetheless attempt to define some of
these characteristic features, it becomes clear that the majority of the
works are marked by a highly distanced visual language regardless of the
medium and subject matter. Expressivity, emotionality, not to mention
exhibitionist self-portrayal are almost never a component of these
works. Instead, a certain consistency in stylistic staging, masterly
skill, and a nearly technoid-like surface smoothness are what stand out,
features which to a Western eye initially appears to contradict the
works' poetic strength and spiritual density, but which actually, at
second glance, serves to intensify these.

Taiji Matsue: Iran 1998, 1998
Deutsche Bank Collection
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
|